Reading 12

The idea of having self-driving cars has always fascinated me. I remember growing up and seeing them in science fiction shows and movies and have always wondered if having them was actually possible. Now that some companies are testing them in real world scenarios, I think it is important to take a step back and address the ethics behind using this type of technology in our everyday lives. In some cases, it seems like humanity as a whole thinks, “if we can do it, let’s do it,” and doesn’t stop and think about potential consequences of adopting new technologies. I think that using fully autonomous cars is a good example of this phenomenon.  
Companies have good reasons for implementing this technology into their cars. For example, the Tesla article All Tesla Cars Being Produced Now Have Full Self-Driving Hardware states, “Self-driving vehicles will play a crucial role in improving transportation safety and accelerating the world’s transition to a sustainable future. Full autonomy will enable a Tesla to be substantially safer than a human driver, lower the financial cost of transportation for those who own a car and provide low-cost on-demand mobility for those who do not.” I am skeptical of the idea that a fully autonomous vehicle would be “substantially safer than a human driver.” I believe that there are situations that arise when driving that only a human would be able to prepare for and react accordingly too.
An article in The Seattle Times states, “Sensors embedded in autonomous cars allow them to “see” the world with far more precision than humans, but the cars struggle to translate visual cues on the road into predictions about what might happen next, Iagnemma said. They also struggle to handle new scenarios they haven’t encountered before.” The thought that the car would not be able to adapt to new scenarios is very troubling to me. For example, what if there are kids playing near the side of the road, does the car have the ability to tell that those are humans that could potentially run into the street? Or does it think that the objects are trees or mailboxes and that there is not potential danger. There is an unknown number of possible scenarios that a driver, human or autonomous, could face on any given drive, and I believe human nature and instincts is vital in reacting appropriately in all of those cases.  
The economic impact must also be taken into consideration when discussing the implementation of self-driving cars. If these vehicles become popular around the United States, truck drivers, delivery people, and taxi drivers could all be out of jobs. This could have a huge impact on our economy.

Personally, I do not believe that I would ever want to own or even ride in a fully autonomous vehicle. I do not think that I would trust a machine with my life, knowing the complexity of driving a car. There is something about having a human, myself or someone else, in control of the vehicle that I find comforting in transportation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 01

I believe that there are two distinct definitions of the word hacker, one that applies to those within the computer science community and one used by those who are not. While, as mentioned in the article “The Word ‘Hacker',” individuals in the programming community generally have a positive outlook on the word “hacker,” while members of the general public have a more sinister understanding of the word. Those not familiar with computer science and with the role programmers or hackers play typically view hackers as only being those who are committing crimes, violating privacy, lack ethics, and are harming our world in the end. While it is certainly true that there are many programmers who use their skills in a detrimental and adverse way, many of those within the technology community aspire to use their hacking to enable our world to be more efficient, secure, and productive. It is often over-looked by the general public that in order to stop a criminal hacker, often times someone m...
Read more

Reading 07

Online advertising is always something that has creeped me out a little bit but at the same time I am thankful for it. One cannot deny the convenience of going to your favorite website, such as ESPN, and checking the scores of last night’s games and at the same time seeing advertisements for the running shows you have been looking for the past few weeks scroll along the side and bottom of your screen. That being said, however, it is definitely troubling how our what we think is private may not actually be and that these companies are able to track what we have been searching for every day. The Privacy and Surveillance in America Article states that “people in America complain about eroding privacy, but have taken only “modest steps” to curb data collection. In a study last year, Pew found that some Americans responded to concerns about surveillance by changing their privacy settings on social media (17 percent); using social media less often (15 percent); avoiding certain apps (15 pe...
Read more

Reading 04

While I do believe that codes of conduct are important for companies, organizations, or communities to have, I think that their importance is often overstated. In his article The Code of Conduct , Jesse Noller defines a code of conduct as a set of rules outlining the responsibilities of or proper practices for an individual, party, or organization. A code of conduct does not illustrate what one can do or must be, but what is not acceptable. The author goes on to discuss how a code of conduct is similar to a set of laws due to the manner in which they discourage harmful behavior. I would argue that a code of conduct is not much different that the codes of ethics we discussed in previous classes.   However, codes of conduct are, I believe, enforceable whereas codes of ethics are merely a behavioral guide. Codes ethics and codes of conduct both are less impactful than laws. Codes of conduct and ethics, to me, seem to be more a mission statement or public relations act saying, “This i...
Read more