Reading 13

According to the readings, a patent is a set of exclusive rights given to an inventor for a limited period of time in exchange for detailed public disclosure of their invention. Patents are granted to applicants who have invented something new, useful, and non-obvious. A patent does not give the right to make or sell an invention, but rather gives the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling for the term of the patents, usually twenty years.
Patents are intended to prevent others from copying an invention or the wat in which that invention is created. By disclosing all of the details behind an invention, patents promote individuals to try to find more efficient and less costly ways of manufacturing products. They also encourage innovation by granting the inventor with the sole right to manufacture and sell their invention. If someone knows that they and anything they might create is protected, they will be more willing and motivated to innovate.
While patents do provide legal protection against the copying of an inventor’s invention, there are some negatives that must be considered. One thing that some may turn people away from applying for a patent is the requirement to reveal the process of producing the invention. Coca-Cola is famous for not having a patent for the formula behind Coke. They have chosen to keep their formula a secret.
I believe that patents are a good thing and that they should continue to be granted. Patents reward individuals who are able to create something, new, useful, and non-obvious. By doing so, patents motivate individuals to be the first to create something, and for others to try to find better ways to create the same thing, or make alternatives all together. This competition can help create choices in the market. Without patents, I believe that there would be less innovation and that the progression of society would ultimately take much longer.
I believe that patents on software should be granted in addition to those on physical and tangible artifacts. To my understanding, the process of creating a new piece of software can be as involved as the process for creating something more tangible. The reading states that “U.S. patent law excludes ‘abstract ideas,’ and this has been used to refuse some patients involving software.” To the average individual, especial our ageing lawmakers, software may seem like an abstract idea, however, I believe that it is not and that the same befits of offering patents for tangible inventions can be seen by rewarding patents for software.

According to the readings, “a patent troll uses patents as legal weapons, instead of actually creating any new products or coming up with new ideas.” This is clearly an issue as they take away the integrity of patents. Perhaps it is necessary for there to be some sort of reform in the patents application or in the ability for individuals to buy and sell patents. With any system, there will always be those who try to exploit it. I do not believe that patent trolls create enough of an issue that the administration of patents must be stopped.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reading 01

I believe that there are two distinct definitions of the word hacker, one that applies to those within the computer science community and one used by those who are not. While, as mentioned in the article “The Word ‘Hacker',” individuals in the programming community generally have a positive outlook on the word “hacker,” while members of the general public have a more sinister understanding of the word. Those not familiar with computer science and with the role programmers or hackers play typically view hackers as only being those who are committing crimes, violating privacy, lack ethics, and are harming our world in the end. While it is certainly true that there are many programmers who use their skills in a detrimental and adverse way, many of those within the technology community aspire to use their hacking to enable our world to be more efficient, secure, and productive. It is often over-looked by the general public that in order to stop a criminal hacker, often times someone m...
Read more

Reading 07

Online advertising is always something that has creeped me out a little bit but at the same time I am thankful for it. One cannot deny the convenience of going to your favorite website, such as ESPN, and checking the scores of last night’s games and at the same time seeing advertisements for the running shows you have been looking for the past few weeks scroll along the side and bottom of your screen. That being said, however, it is definitely troubling how our what we think is private may not actually be and that these companies are able to track what we have been searching for every day. The Privacy and Surveillance in America Article states that “people in America complain about eroding privacy, but have taken only “modest steps” to curb data collection. In a study last year, Pew found that some Americans responded to concerns about surveillance by changing their privacy settings on social media (17 percent); using social media less often (15 percent); avoiding certain apps (15 pe...
Read more

Reading 04

While I do believe that codes of conduct are important for companies, organizations, or communities to have, I think that their importance is often overstated. In his article The Code of Conduct , Jesse Noller defines a code of conduct as a set of rules outlining the responsibilities of or proper practices for an individual, party, or organization. A code of conduct does not illustrate what one can do or must be, but what is not acceptable. The author goes on to discuss how a code of conduct is similar to a set of laws due to the manner in which they discourage harmful behavior. I would argue that a code of conduct is not much different that the codes of ethics we discussed in previous classes.   However, codes of conduct are, I believe, enforceable whereas codes of ethics are merely a behavioral guide. Codes ethics and codes of conduct both are less impactful than laws. Codes of conduct and ethics, to me, seem to be more a mission statement or public relations act saying, “This i...
Read more